本文共 1553 字，大约阅读时间需要 5 分钟。

Link:

They typical Windows event loop in a game or tool may look something like:

while( running ) {    if( PeekMessage( ... ) ) {      TranslateMessage( ... );        DispatchMessage( ... );    }    Render();  }

There are at least two problems with that:

1) You're calling PeekMessage(), which immediately returns, so the loop will just spin. GetMessage() will wait until there's a message available (and yield the CPU).

2) You're calling Render() once per windows message. This is really bad, as certain windows transactions take many messages. Your look should look something like:

HANDLE h = (HANDLE)CreateEvent( 0, false, false, 0 );  while( running ) {    while( PeekMessage( ... ) ) {      TranslateMessage( ... );      DispatchMessage( ... );    }    timeout = CalculateNextFrameTimeout();    if( timeout <= 0 ) { // time to render?      Render();      timeout = CalculateNextFrameTimeout();    }    // use an alertable wait    MsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx( 1, &h, timeout, QS_ALLEVENTS,         MWMO_ALERTABE|MWMO_INPUTAVAILABLE );    }  CloseHandle( h );

This code assumes that Render() does something that makes the next call to CalculateNextFrameTimeout() return greater than 0 for a while :-)

This code will keep the frame rate limited, and give up any CPU not needed. It will efficiently dispatch cascades of Windows events. And, most importantly, it will immediately wake up and dispatch any events generated by the user (such as from mousemove, keydown, etc) because it uses an alterable sleep. Sleep() is not alertable.

转载地址：http://fdzvb.baihongyu.com/